There has been much discussion about abortion and Planned Parenthood in
the news as of late and both sides seem to be getting more frustrated. The
anger seems to be aimed at the women who utilize these clinics, yet no solution
arises from all of the discussion, so I offer mine.
Since it seems women don’t
get it and continue to have indiscriminate, unprotected sex with men who have
no intention of marrying us and then we wantonly get pregnant and march off to
the abortion clinic only to have it ripped from our womb.
Ladies, we don’t get
it, and we can’t be trusted to do the right thing…so I think it’s time for
those opposing women having control over their bodies try a new angle. Focus
your attention on the men and leave it up to them to put an end to this
insanity.
The abortion issue is less
complicated than it seems, because there is a simple solution; condoms. Okay,
it isn’t perfect but if condoms were used consistently and properly with every
sex act we would put a huge dent in unwanted pregnancies.
After all they are 98% effective in
preventing pregnancy, as well as preventing STD’s; so let’s put this issue to
bed once and for all.
Really, it’s that
simple-isn’t it?
Friday, October 2, 2015
Monday, June 8, 2015
Once Upon A Time...
Imagine a place where there is harmony. You are surrounded
by people who value the same things that you value; stability, security,
integrity and mutual respect. Because you have similar values and you
essentially want the same things for your future - crime is relatively rare. Of
course there are disagreements and situations that need resolution but those
resolutions are not difficult to come by because you gave the same vision for
your future and the future of your children and the future looks good.
But one day others decided that you were too much alike; you
lacked diversity and were too isolated from the cultures around the world. You
needed to be more inclusive; embrace the other cultures of the world, bring
them into your society and allow them to assimilate into your society so you
could coexist.
So, being generous and open minded you decide that it will
be a good thing to invite others in and extend your generosity to them so that
they are able to enjoy the benefits your society has to offer. You are
optimistic that they will learn from you and you will learn from them and
together you can build an even better future for everyone.
But there is a problem with that. The other people that you
so graciously accepted and welcomed into your society don’t want to assimilate.
They aren’t interested in who you are as a community, they don’t care about
your beliefs or your values. In fact, they despise your beliefs and your values
and deride the way you act, the way you think, and the way you look. They believe
women are second class citizens. They believe their culture is superior and
believe everyone should accept it.
No one wants to be critical of the others because that would
be offensive to them and their way of life, so no one says anything. The
natives adapt to the others and make room for their intolerance and judgement;
they make excuses for them and cover up their behavior.
Now imagine that same place some year’s later, violent crime
has increased up by 300% and rape is up by 1472%. Only one other country, known
for its violence against women has a higher incidence of rape than this country.
That is and of itself is horrible; but the real tragedy is that those in charge
are still making excuses for those others that see fit to commit violent acts
against those who so unconditionally accepted them into their community.
Tuesday, February 3, 2015
A World of Illusions
We live in a world of illusions. Advertisers manipulate us
with images of the life they think we want and all we have to do to get it is
buy their product and that perfect life is ours. So we go out and buy the product or whatever
it is they are selling and are disappointed when nothing in our life changes.
Advertisers lie to us, politicians lie to us constantly and then we lie to
ourselves. We lie for many reasons; to maintain an image, to make others think
we are something better or more interesting and we lie because we want to
maintain some sort of control in an environment that at times seems
overwhelming; after all the truth can be difficult. Advertisers and politicians
get to us to think with our emotions rather than reason and logic and most of
the time we aren’t even aware that it’s happening.
With all of the distractions and images surrounding us it’s
easy to lose track of who we really are. We get tossed into categories that aim
to define and limit us, but that isn’t the reality. We are individuals, each
with unique personalities to be celebrated not restricted by a politician or
advertisers narrow definition of who they think we are or should be. There is
room for different opinions and different thoughts; that’s what this country
was built on. Being true to yourself is the best gift you can give.
Tuesday, September 2, 2014
The Two Front War on Women
Liberals
and conservatives both seem to have some desperate need to place women into some
narrowly defined box of what it means to be a woman. Conservatives speak of the
traditional woman, liberals the liberated woman, what does that mean, who sets
the definition of what that is? Is traditional defined by marriage and children
or is it defined by what her ideology is and how she lives her life, can you be
a traditional woman and not marry? There seems to be this prevalent attitude
that a woman is somehow flawed if she fails to take the path society has laid
out for her. If both conservatives and liberals believe in the individual and
individual choice, why not let her decide what path is best suited for her?
Marriage
is not for everyone, raising a family is not for everyone, being single is not
for everyone and why isn’t that okay? If you are a woman of a certain age and
are childless you are judged. If you are a single mother (for whatever reason)
you are judged. If you are a working mother you are judged, if you aren’t working
you are judged. One size does not fit all and no, we don’t all want the same
thing, both sides should celebrate that not attack it. We claim that we
celebrate the individual and individual liberty but we attack those who choose
a path we find distasteful or are unfamiliar with.
While
the numbers vary according to the source; on average 40-50% of marriages end in
divorce, 60-67% of second marriages end in divorce and 73-74% third marriages
do. Many more divorces are occurring with those over the age of 50;
sociologists say the rate has doubled since the 1990’s and 66% of those
divorces are initiated by women, one would have to wonder why?
AARP
did a survey of dying people and asked what their biggest regrets were; the
number one regret was not having the courage to live a life true to myself.
That pretty much says it all.
We
are human beings before we are women and there is not a one size fits all.
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
A Random Thought
If you have ever found yourself wondering how things in the
world seem to get so off course. Let’s start with this…The Hegelian Dialectic;
bringing about change in three parts…
Thesis-create the problem
Antithesis-Generate opposition (fear, panic, hysteria)
Synthesis- Solution to the problem created in step 1
Certainly real problems come our way…but lately it seems as
though the solutions to the problem border on insanity. One could insert almost
any crisis to test this theory. Global warming as an example; the motivation
may be money, power or some twisted idea about social justice. The elite would
like the people to go in a certain direction, but no one rational person would
go in that direction,(create a world with higher and higher energy costs, fail
to create jobs, etc.) so we must create
a problem. Global warming is the problem and
unless we return to the dark ages and stop using fossil fuels the polar
bears will die and so will we. Fear and
panic must be injected into the daily conversation so that people begin to
believe it. The storms will become more and more severe; we will run out of
food….then steps in the government….with the solution….more regulations…bigger
government. Less freedom for the people and fewer choices and the choices we
have will all cost more. Remember…never let a crisis go to waste.
Monday, April 14, 2014
An Essay
The
Search for Self
In
Buddhism it seems the concept of “self” is similar to that of “soul” in
Christianity. Christians live out their lives on Earth so that their soul may
live on for eternity. The Buddha believes that nothing is permanent in as much
as things are constantly in flux. Also, there is the question of how we
perceive things and if our perception is or can ever be accurate. To a great
degree we are a product of our environment so we interpret things and see
things based on the biases and beliefs’ with which we were raised. Taking that into consideration it would stand
to reason that our perception is perhaps skewed and not entirely rooted in
truth.
Attempting
to conceptualize the existence of “self” would be reliant upon the perception
of what it means to exist. Human beings feel pain, happiness and many other
sensations that are physical as well as emotional. So we know that at least in
some sense we do indeed exist. The Buddha believed that everything is connected
and to a certain degree we are all just a part of something else and reliant
upon the grand idea of something greater than “self”. When one of us ceases to
exist the world carries on as it has so nothing depends upon the existence of a
self.
Buddhism,
as with many religions or philosophies is a way of looking at the world and a set
of beliefs that guide us as to how we should live our lives. The only way for
any religion to work is for everyone to accept the fact that there is only one
path to nirvana, or one path for salvation and for that to be true, the idea of
an individual must be rejected.
In
all societies rules must be established so that people may live together
peacefully. One person’s well-being cannot be more important than someone
else’s. Belonging to a group, any group requires a certain amount of rejecting
the “self” so that everyone’s needs are taken into consideration. Society would
break down if it was “every man for himself” so to speak because each person
would only be thinking of their own needs at the expense of others. As with most things that require faith, it is
impossible to prove or disprove whether or not they are true. Science can prove
when the Earth was formed with a certain degree of certainty but it cannot
prove there is no God. I can reject the power of prayer but there is no way for
me to prove it works or that it doesn’t. The Buddha can reject the idea of
“self” in the context of Buddhism but that doesn’t mean a person doesn’t have a
“soul”, it is undeterminable.
The
idea of “self” to me cannot be rejected, yet I do concur our perception of self
is misguided. I am an individual but I am also a part of the universe and
everything that encompasses, the trick is in convincing everyone else of that.
Christianity instills the belief that humans have dominion over everything
else, so it breeds this notion that we, the “individual” are the most important
thing. My actions or inactions not only
impact me, they also impact others, in ways I may or may not be aware of.
The
path to anything, including nirvana requires many things and there is no one
way to get there. Introspection is the first step to any type of discovery and
the reconciliation of the self and the whole. I am no more important and am no
less important than what is around me. A balance needs to exist in everything,
when things are out of balance it doesn’t work. That balance is true within the
context of the self as well. Believing that “ego” is part of the “self”, it is
a delicate balance that keeps that in check. Too much ego and I go about life
thinking my needs are more important than those of others, too little ego and
the chances of me being exploited or taken advantage of increase.
It
may seem as though this paper rambles a bit, probably because it does. When I
realized this I began to panic and frantically began editing and trying to
salvage what I had so that I would not have to start over with a new position.
Then I stepped back and began thinking about the subject matter, the existence
of self, or not as the case may be and I made a decision to leave the paper as
it was not because I thought the paper had such merit but because in some ways
the paper illustrated a process; a process of “self” discovery. The “self”
changes, evolves and we are not the same person as we were just a day ago and I
am not the same person I was when I began this paper, perhaps that is the
beginning.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Utopia
Visions of nowhere…….or you can’t get there from here…..
Utopia is indefinable yet it’s an idea that simply won’t die. The propagandists out there (and you know who you are) would have us all believe that by making everyone the same (however they intend to do that, I guess by making us gender neutral, financially neutral and mentally neutral) everyone will be happy.
Really what that means is they would force their idea of happiness on the rest of us. In their perverted world making everyone equally miserable solves all of the world’s problems.
The flaw in that theory is of course that they are not capable of experiencing happiness on any level so then we would all be emotionally neutral just like them, surviving in the well of darkness.
Darkness is implacable, be careful what you wish for.
How do you define Utopia?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)